// you’re reading...

Paper

Praise Big Pharma

If you are sick, there is no better place and time to live than America in the 21st century. The past 50 years have witnessed an explosion of medical innovation in the West. Drugs have been developed to lower cholesterol, fight AIDS, and altogether eradicate some diseases. Pharmaceutical companies have invested, and are investing, tens of billions of dollars each year researching new technologies to extend human life. Some day in the near future, doctors may be writing prescriptions to slow your grandmother’s Alzheimer’s, to kill your father’s brain tumor, or to vaccinate your baby daughter against the virus that causes cervical cancer. (Actually, cross that last one off the list—the HPV vaccine was invented a few years ago.) Just as our current era has been called the Information Age, the next era of human history may very well be dubbed the Biological Age.

Yet, despite the obvious benefits pharmaceutical companies bestow upon mankind, “Big Pharma” is more vilified than almost any other industry. Critics charge that pharmaceutical companies, in their reckless pursuit of profit, produce dangerous and ineffective medicines. They claim that drugs are rushed to market without ample concern given to possible health risks.

In fact, since the average drug takes 15 years and $500 million to produce, a pharmaceutical company puts its good name on the line every time it produces a new drug. The risk of expensive lawsuits, and the accompanying loss of credibility, always loom large. In the rare instances where drugs are found to have negative effects, they are taken off the market as quickly as possible. No drug company would last five minutes if it disregarded the well -being of its customers.

Big Pharma is demonized not because it profits by harming sick people, but because it profits from treating them. What critics imply, but never say openly, is that there is something nefarious about making money by fulfilling a vital human need.

Is there? Businesses earn profits by creating values to fulfill the needs of potential customers, and the more crucial the need, the greater the value. Big Pharma makes massive profits because it produces medicines that are of great value to sick people—of such great value that the sick are willing to pay top dollar for them.

Does this mean, as Big Pharma’s critics say, that drug companies are holding the sick hostage? Of course not. Such a view implies that sick people are the rightful owners of the drugs, which pharmaceutical companies illicitly swipe and hold for ransom. In fact, it is the pharmaceutical companies that have a right to the drugs that they have created.

Life-saving medicines don’t grow on trees. The “miracle” drugs that improve our health and extend our lives must be discovered. They would not exist were it not for the enormous investments of time and money made by the men and women who work in the pharmaceutical industry. It takes the ingenious effort of thousands of individuals and hundreds of millions of dollars to bring a single drug to market. As with any other commodity, those who create these remedies have a moral right to set the terms of their sale. And to profit handsomely from their achievement.

The enemies of Big Pharma disagree. On their view, achievement is not to be rewarded, but punished. And the greater the value one creates, the less of a right one has to it.

This is a perverse injustice. There’s nothing wrong with making money by servicing people’s needs. Productivity is a virtue, not a vice. The fact that Big Pharma profits by helping sick people is something for which it should be lauded, not derided.

So I say: Praise Big Pharma!

Dan Edge is a 29-year old small business owner living in Rockland County, New York. He earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Philosophy from the University of South Carolina, and is currently a Sophomore at the Objectivist Academic Center. He keeps a weekly blog called “The Edge of Reason” at http://danedgeofreason.blogspot.com.

del.icio.us:Praise Big Pharma digg:Praise Big Pharma newsvine:Praise Big Pharma reddit:Praise Big Pharma fark:Praise Big Pharma facebook:Praise Big Pharma

Discussion

3 comments for “Praise Big Pharma”

  1. Thank you. The bashing of Big Pharma is so prevalent that drug companies contribute to it themselves — apologizing for the profits they make by offering “goodwill” programs of free drugs for the poor, which only draw further criticism (why can’t we ALL have free drugs?).

    Pharmaceutical companies are not entirely innocent — they need to stop trying to get the government to buy their drugs (which is a long-term strategy for suicide, as this can only lead to demands for price controls in the future) — but on the whole, the value they create is far greater than the sins they commit. Particularly considering that they have to produce that value in the face of the heaviest government regulations of any industry.

    Posted by Stella Daily | April 10, 2008, 7:00 am
  2. […] article in the latest issue of the Undercurrent examines the cultural vilification of Big Pharma. The piece […]

    Posted by The Undercurrent | Consumer Protection in a Free Market | April 10, 2008, 8:43 pm
  3. Good points, for its parts.

    Working in pharma development and research lets you see a bit beyond the horror of “Oh no, they charge a lot of money for these drugs.” Screw that. The cost of getting a novel drug to Phase 2 trials is approximately $800 million.

    They’ve got to make that money back, plus make up cost of all the drugs that do not make it. Fine. They do that. They make a lot of money and that’s respectable. That’s good business. It’s when they pull crap like this:

    Gabapentin: Marketed illegally and sold to consumers for conditions it had never been studied for, wasn’t safe for and had never been approved for.

    Xigris: Rumors of a false shortage to try to increase sales. Messy. Still in progress.

    Zyprexa: An antipsychotic medication. The government spends a lot of money on these, as they’re by and large the only people who will treat schizophrenics. Eli Lily covered up massive research data concerning metabolic side effects of the drug. Serious metabolic side effects, people getting dysregulation of sugar and fat metabolism, gaining hundreds of pounds and becoming diabetic in a matter of months.

    The pharma companies get shit for charging for drugs. Admittedly, they waste a lot of money, but they bring something we desperately need in the face of massive legal difficulties. But at the same time they turn around. When you say that drug companies wouldn’t last five minutes if they disregarded the health of patients, I can’t disagree more. They do. They do frequently, they have done so in the past. They are still here. We need them, and we need what they make so very badly.

    There’s a certain form of infantile epilepsy. Untreated, it results in profound mental and physical retardation. Treated, the child can grow up and have a relatively normal life. There was one drug produced to treat this under orphan drug protection. It cost about 1000 dollars per year to treat a child. This is by no means unreasonable. When the manufacturer gets bought out, and the price gets jacked up to 17500 a year… well. You see parents who are forced to choose between their child’s future health, and keeping their home. In the popular press, they get a bad rap for charging high prices for new meds. In the medical world, they get bad rap for doing stuff like the above.

    Posted by Serpens | April 10, 2008, 9:18 pm

Post a comment

Objectivism

The Undercurrent's cultural commentary is based on Ayn Rand's philosophy, Objectivism. Objectivism, which animates Ayn Rand's fiction, is a systematic philosophy of life. It holds that the universe is orderly and comprehensible, that man survives by reason, that his life and happiness comprise his highest moral purpose, and that he flourishes only in a society that protects his individual rights.

Event Calendar

Add an event

May 2008
S M T W T F S
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Most Emailed