By Government Fiat Alone

fiat-dashboardAiling automaker Chrysler LLC has entered into an agreement with Italian carmaker Fiat SpA. The deal would involve an exchange of technology and access to distribution networks, giving Fiat a 35% stake in Chrysler without it having to pay a single euro. However, the deal will only become binding if the US government guarantees $3 billion in aid.

The US government has already poured billions into Chrysler, but nevertheless, its plants remain closed and the company itself remains unprofitable. Chrysler’s private equity owners, who paid billions for the company in 2007, have refused to contribute another cent to their underperforming investment. Chrysler is clearly a moribund company kept clinging to life only by government funds. Now, Fiat is demanding a guarantee from US taxpayers on an investment it deems too risky to make with its own money.

While Americans face the worst economic downturn in decades, these auto companies think that taxpayers should surrender their hard-earned money to pay for Chrysler’s mistakes. Only a government that has abandoned the protection of property rights would sacrifice the wealth of productive individuals to the black hole of the auto lobby in Detroit. In a free market, a company in such a state would likely be sold off or broken up; in a mixed economy veering towards outright socialism, the government is the handmaiden of such devil’s bargains, serving political interests over individual rights.

The government’s only proper economic role is to maintain an environment in which companies and individuals are free to contract with each other as they see fit. Rather than resting the risks of its deal squarely on the backs of American taxpayers, Fiat should be committing its own money to this deal with Chrysler—and thereby accepting the consequences of success or failure on its own. This deal, however, is not one that could have been made in a free market, but by government fiat alone.

3 Comments

Comments

Now the exact opposite is happening...the government is saying that it won't give Chrysler more federal funds unless it partners with Fiat SpA within the next month.

If partnering with Fiat SpA really were a good business decision that would bring better products and more profit to Chrysler, why would it still need government dollars? Instead of Fiat SpA waiting on the government to invest in Chrysler, now just the opposite is happening. The government wants assurance that Chrysler is somehow worth bailing out!

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123841609048669495.html

I agree that the government has no business supporting Chrysler. However, they also have no business regulating it, which they have done for at least the past 70 years. Chrysler's predicament is not completely due to their own mistakes. The government has forbidden Chrysler's leaders to manage their labor according to their own best judgement since the 1930's. This has made it impossible for Chrysler to make small cars profitably. Government CAFE laws force Chrysler to build and sell small cars anyway, at a loss. I can go on for hours about OSHA and environmental laws Chrysler has had to deal with. You can't entirely blame Chrysler management when the government has tied one hand behind their back all these years.

Well stated. Clear and concise.